Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is much better than vivo X70, with a general score of 84.2 against 73.8. The Apple iPhone XS body has the same thickness than vivo X70, but it is just a little lighter. IPhone XS counts with just a bit better display than vivo X70, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 pixels and a bit greater pixels number in each inch of display.
IPhone XS features just a little better performance than vivo X70, because although it has a lower number of cores and they are also slower and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The vivo X70 counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X70 has a much better camera than iPhone XS, because although it has a smaller aperture and a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with a much more MP back facing camera.
Vivo X70 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 65% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.