Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and Gray |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ is better than the vivo X70, getting an 81.3 score against 73.8. LG V35 ThinQ's construction is lighter and a little bit thinner than the vivo X70, even though it was released 3 years before. Vivo X70 counts with a little better hardware performance than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 also has a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more vivid display than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch of display. Vivo X70 features a superior camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a way better 40 mega pixels resolution back camera, better video frame rate and a bigger sensor capturing better quality photos.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The vivo X70 counts with superior battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.