Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Sonic silver |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is a little bit better than vivo X70, having a 76.2 score against 73.8. Even being the best in this review, the nubia Red Magic 5S is an older, noticeably thicker and somewhat heavier phone than the vivo X70. These phones include Android OS, but the nubia Red Magic 5S has an older 10 version and vivo X70 has Android 11.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a slightly better looking screen than vivo X70, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the vivo X70, they have equal internal storage.
Vivo X70 counts with a bit faster CPU than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little longer battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X70, because it has a camera with much more MP, a larger camera aperture to take better photos in low-light situations, a much larger sensor and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.