Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50s has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than vivo X70's 73.8 global score. The Galaxy A50s body has the same thickness than vivo X70, but it is a little lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A50s has 10 version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a screen that's just as good as vivo X70's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display density. Galaxy A50s features much more memory to store more apps and games than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X70 has a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has 2 GB more RAM. Vivo X70 has a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than vivo X70, because although it has a tinier aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a back camera with a better 48 megapixels resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.