Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | -- |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the vivo X70, having a 91.3 score against 73.8. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must highlight that it's also a just a little bit thicker and just a little heavier cellphone.
The Galaxy A52 5G and vivo X70 both count with really similar screens, because although the Galaxy A52 5G has a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater display density and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The vivo X70 has a little faster processor than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has 2 GB more RAM.
Galaxy A52 5G features a bit better camera than vivo X70, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and videos, a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than vivo X70, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G has a bit superior battery life than vivo X70, because it has a 2% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.