Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the vivo X70, having an 87.5 score against 73.8. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't see any difference regarding that. The Samsung Galaxy A71 construction has the same thickness than vivo X70, but it is just a little lighter.
The vivo X70 features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display. The vivo X70 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 features just a bit better camera than vivo X70, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A71 also counts with a camera in the back with way more megapixels, a much bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy A71 features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X70, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A71 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A71 has just a bit better battery life than vivo X70, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.