Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism bricks black |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is way better than vivo X70, having a general score of 92.9 against 73.8. Even being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is an older, just a little thicker and a little bit heavier phone than the vivo X70. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and vivo X70 has Android 11.
The vivo X70 features a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G UW. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X70 and the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW have quite similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a quite larger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than vivo X70, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X70, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better battery lifetime than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.