Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the vivo X70's 73.8 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy Fold design is just a little bit thinner than the vivo X70, but it is incredibly heavier and was released 2 years before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold and vivo X70 feature really similar processing units, and although the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X70 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2376 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory for games and applications than vivo X70, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold's battery duration is just as good as the battery life in vivo X70, although the Galaxy Fold has a 0 percent lower battery size. The vivo X70 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and photos and a lot smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X70 also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.