Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is a lot better than the vivo X70's overall score of 73.8. Even being the best phone we compare here, we must tell that it is also an older, a little bit heavier and a bit thicker phone. Galaxy Note 20 and vivo X70 feature very similar displays, because although the Galaxy Note 20 has a just a little inferior pixel count per inch in the display, it also counts with a little larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and vivo X70 feature incredibly similar storage for applications and games, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 features a CPU that is very similar to vivo X70's processing unit, both of them have 8 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
The vivo X70 features a little better battery life than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity. Vivo X70 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low-light situations and a much tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a way lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 40 MP resolution and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.