Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the vivo X70, having a global score of 98.9 against 73.8. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a newer 13 version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier than the vivo X70.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than vivo X70, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution, a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen and a quite bigger screen. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a little better processing power than vivo X70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than vivo X70, because it has a much better resolution back camera, a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little better battery life than vivo X70, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.