Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than the vivo X70, having a general score of 79.3 against 73.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note 5 has older 5.1 version and vivo X70 has Android 11. Galaxy Note 5 is a a bit lighter cellphone than vivo X70, but they are 0.3inches thick.
Vivo X70 features a better processor than Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM memory and 7 more cpu cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better pixels density.
Vivo X70 shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking worse quality photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a same size aperture, the vivo X70 also counts with a way more megapixels camera and better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The vivo X70 counts with a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Vivo X70 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.