Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a global score of 80.4, which is just a bit better than vivo X70's 73.8 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body is a little bit lighter than the vivo X70, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released 4 years before. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit more vivid display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X70, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 256 GB. Vivo X70 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the vivo X70 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The vivo X70 features a much longer battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 38% larger battery capacity. Vivo X70 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in low light environments and a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.