Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than the vivo X70, getting an 86.2 score against 73.8. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is a better phone than vivo X70, it must be noted that it's also older, a little bit heavier and thicker. Both of these devices have the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite and vivo X70 both have similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger screen. Vivo X70 counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has more RAM memory.
The vivo X70 shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing worse quality pictures and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with a lot better 40 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than vivo X70, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery duration than vivo X70, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.