Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the vivo X70's 73.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note4's design is a little bit lighter than the vivo X70, but it's a little bit thicker and was released 7 years before. The vivo X70 features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit better looking screen than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The vivo X70 has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X70 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a way better 40 mega-pixels resolution camera, a bigger camera aperture and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The vivo X70 has a much better battery life than Galaxy Note4, because it has a 4400mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.