Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is just a bit better than the vivo X70, having a general score of 80.2 against 73.8. The Galaxy Note5 construction has the same thickness than the vivo X70, but it's a bit lighter. The vivo X70 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note5 has a little sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixel amount in each inch of display. The vivo X70 features a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory.
Vivo X70 features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 47% greater battery capacity. The vivo X70 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition and the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X70 also counts with higher video frame rates and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.