Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-10 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is much better than vivo X70's 73.8 general score. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so both should offer all the same operating system features. The Galaxy S10 is a older and a little thicker cellphone than the vivo X70, but Samsung could make it somewhat lighter anyway.
The vivo X70 has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S10. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy S10 counts with a slightly better display than vivo X70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
The Galaxy S10 features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X70, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X70 features a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture and a tinier sensor taking less light and dull colors, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP.
The vivo X70 counts with superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 29% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.