Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is a lot better than vivo X70's score of 73.8. Even being the best in this comparison, it must be noted that it is also an older, just a bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone. The vivo X70 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy S10 Lite. They have 8 GB of RAM memory and 8 CPU cores.
The vivo X70 and the Galaxy S10 Lite feature similar screens, because although the Galaxy S10 Lite has a just a little inferior pixel number in each screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit bigger display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X70, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better battery performance than vivo X70, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S10 Lite features just a bit better camera than vivo X70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures and a camera with a higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.