Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than vivo X70, with a 95.4 score against 73.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while vivo X70 has Android 11. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is thicker and noticeably heavier than the vivo X70. Vivo X70 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have 8 cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better looking screen than vivo X70, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a quite larger screen and a higher display density. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has as much storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as vivo X70, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better photos and videos than vivo X70, because it has a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs, a much better video quality, a larger aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a bit better battery duration than vivo X70, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.