| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Glass | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy S4 is a little bit better than vivo X70, getting a general score of 79 against 73.8. Galaxy S4's construction is extremely lighter than vivo X70, although it's a bit thicker and was released many years before. Both phones in this review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S4 has an older 4.4 version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S4 features a better screen than vivo X70, because although it has a little bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen density. The vivo X70 has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S4, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X70 has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger aperture, a much more MP camera and a larger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
The vivo X70 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.