| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.59 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold, Red and White |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S5 is a little bit better than the vivo X70, getting a score of 80.8 against 73.8. The Galaxy S5 design is somewhat lighter than the vivo X70, but it's a little thicker and was released 7 years before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S5 has the newer 4.4.2 version and vivo X70 has Android 11, providing you a couple additional features.
The vivo X70 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S5, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. Galaxy S5 features a more vivid display than vivo X70, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels, it also counts with a higher pixels count in each inch of screen.
Vivo X70 counts with a better camera than Galaxy S5, because although it has a tinier camera sensor, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited environments, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
The vivo X70 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S5, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S5, because it has a 4400mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.