| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2015-04-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Glass | Aluminium and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 252.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 2550mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy S6 has a score of 87.4, which is better than vivo X70's 73.8 score. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 has older 5.0 version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version. Galaxy S6 is an much older phone than the vivo X70, but Samsung could make it just a bit thinner and a lot lighter anyway.
Samsung Galaxy S6 has a little better hardware performance than vivo X70, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits CPU. The Galaxy S6 features a much sharper screen than vivo X70, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a greater screen pixel density.
Vivo X70 captures better videos and photos than Galaxy S6, because although it has a tinier sensor shooting lower quality images and videos, and they both have a F1.9 diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as vivo X70, both have exactly the same internal memory. The vivo X70 features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S6, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity against 2550mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.