Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-09-10 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a global score of 78.1, which is slightly better than vivo X70's 73.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge design has the same thickness than vivo X70, but it's lighter. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while vivo X70 has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features.
Galaxy S7 edge features a bit more vivid display than vivo X70, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher pixel density. The vivo X70 has a greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X70 has a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The vivo X70 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor capturing lower quality photographs and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with better video frame rate and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 40 MP resolution.
The vivo X70 features superior battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 22 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.