Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black |
| Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.33 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a bit better than the vivo X70's overall score of 73.8. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X70 has Android 11 version. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is older, much heavier and incredibly thicker than vivo X70.
The vivo X70 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than vivo X70, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Vivo X70 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and images and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution and a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X70, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit longer battery life than vivo X70, because it has a 2 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.