Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is way better than the vivo X70's 73.8 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is just a little thinner than the vivo X70, but it is much heavier and was released a little bit over a year before. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (operating system).
Vivo X70 and Galaxy Z Fold 2 feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a just a little lower pixels number per screen inch, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1768 x 2208 pixels and a bigger screen. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better hardware performance than vivo X70, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than vivo X70, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The vivo X70 takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller camera sensor capturing much lower quality videos and photographs and a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 also counts with a camera with a way better 40 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little better battery life than vivo X70, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.