Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Sony |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2021-09-10 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.30 x 2.97 x 0.30 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Aurora Down and Cosmic black | Black and White |
| Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G77 MC9 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 40.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia Z4v is just a bit better than the vivo X70, getting a overall score of 78.8 against 73.8. Although the Sony Xperia Z4v is incredibly older and somewhat thicker than the vivo X70, it's design is still somewhat lighter. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS, but Sony Xperia Z4v has 5.1 version while vivo X70 has Android 11.
Sony Xperia Z4v features a sharper display than vivo X70, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher display density. Vivo X70 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X70 also counts with 5 GB more RAM.
Vivo X70 shoots clearer pictures and videos than Xperia Z4v, because although it has a much tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a way worse image quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 also counts with a back-facing camera with a way higher 40 MP resolution, faster video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos.
The vivo X70 counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia Z4v, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 features a way better battery duration than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 47% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.