Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is way better than the vivo X80 Pro, with a general score of 88.1 against 72.6. Even though iPhone X is a lot older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The vivo X80 Pro has a slightly better screen than iPhone X, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bigger screen, a lot brighter screen and a just a bit higher pixel density.
The Apple iPhone X has a really superior processing power than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone X's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to the vivo X80 Pro one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X80 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Vivo X80 Pro has a greater camera than iPhone X, because it has a lot higher video definition, a much more mega pixels camera, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.