Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a global score of 84.2 against 72.6. IPhone XS is an notably older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but Apple made it somewhat lighter and thinner. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit sharper display than iPhone XS, because it has a larger display, a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a lot brighter display.
The vivo X80 Pro has a much better memory to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Apple iPhone XS counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 2659mAh. The vivo X80 Pro features a way better camera than iPhone XS, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much better video quality, a larger aperture to capture better low light images and a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot better quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.