Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel has a score of 80.2, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. Google Pixel is an noticeably older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but Google was able to build it extremely lighter and a bit thinner. Google Pixel counts with a very superior processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a way larger display and a bit greater pixel number per screen inch. Vivo X80 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a lot higher video resolution and a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The vivo X80 Pro features a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 70 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.