Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 overall score. Google Pixel 2 XL is an way older phone than the vivo X80 Pro, but it is thinner and lighter anyway. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a little bit lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a bit larger display.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 2 XL has a much greater processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro has better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 3520mAh. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to take better low light photos, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a lot more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.