Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. Even though the Google Pixel 3 is way older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's design is somewhat thinner and much lighter. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a just a bit higher display pixel density, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a larger display.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 3 counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X80 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
The vivo X80 Pro features a way better camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a much more megapixels back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and video, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a much bigger camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.