Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than vivo X80 Pro, with a 78.8 score against 72.6. Google Pixel 3a's construction is thinner and extremely lighter than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Google Pixel 3a features an extremely better processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro features a much better screen than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a larger display, a quite greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
The vivo X80 Pro features a very superior storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. Vivo X80 Pro features a really longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 57% more battery size. Vivo X80 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a lot larger sensor, a bigger aperture for better photography in low-light situations, a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.