Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a general score of 78.9, which is slightly better than the vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. Despite of the fact that Google Pixel 3a XL is way older than vivo X80 Pro, it's design is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a XL has the older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch of display, a little bigger display and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X80 Pro features improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a way better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.