Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 has a global score of 81.9, which is better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 overall score. The Google Pixel 4 design is notably lighter and thinner than vivo X80 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. Vivo X80 Pro has a better display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display, a larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Google Pixel 4 features a much better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 68% larger battery size.
The vivo X80 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has a lot better resolution back facing camera, a larger aperture to capture better low light photography and videos, a lot larger back camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a lot better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.