Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is better than vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Google Pixel 4a's design is somewhat thinner and way lighter than the vivo X80 Pro, although it was released around a year before.
The Google Pixel 4a features a very superior processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X80 Pro has a brighter screen than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a bit better pixel density and a larger screen.
The vivo X80 Pro features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 4a, because it has more internal storage. Vivo X80 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3140mAh. Vivo X80 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a bigger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.