Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's overall score of 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Although the Google Pixel 4a 5G is older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's body is way lighter and somewhat thinner.
The vivo X80 Pro has a better screen than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bit greater pixels density, a little bigger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a much faster processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations, a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a much higher video resolution and a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with improved battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 21 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.