Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a general score of 89, which is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro's overall score of 72.6. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 5 is older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is a lot lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 5 features an extremely better processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X80 Pro has a better display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a just a little better screen pixel density, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger screen. Vivo X80 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor, a back camera with much more mega pixels, a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X80 Pro features a way bigger storage for apps and games than Google Pixel 5, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X80 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.