Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 516 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro, with a 92.1 score against 72.6. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design construction is newer and a bit thinner, but a bit heavier than the vivo X80 Pro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the newer 14 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version, giving you a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has 12 GB more RAM. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a more vivid display than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution and a little worse amount of pixels per screen inch, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also counts with much more brightness.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 1 TB internal memory. Vivo X80 Pro has a bit better camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography, and they both have a camera with a 50 MP, the vivo X80 Pro also counts with a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with longer battery life than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 19% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.