Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than the vivo X80 Pro, getting a score of 77.7 against 72.6. Despite of the fact the HTC One M9 is notably older and a little thicker than the vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is still extremely lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has an older 5.0 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit better looking display than HTC One M9, because it has a really bigger display, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The HTC One M9 features a really superior performance than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a GPU.
Vivo X80 Pro features a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X80 Pro takes a lot better videos and photos than HTC One M9, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video quality, a back camera with a much better resolution, a lot bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and a lot larger aperture.
Vivo X80 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 4700mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.