Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U Ultra has an overall score of 77, which is slightly better than vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. The HTC U Ultra is an notably older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but HTC could make it thinner and extremely lighter. The HTC U Ultra features an extremely better processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores.
The vivo X80 Pro has a much better screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a quite greater amount of pixels per display inch, a bigger display and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. HTC U Ultra has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Vivo X80 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro captures much better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because it has a lot more MP camera in the back, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture for better images in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.