Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | HTC |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is just a bit better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a score of 77.6 against 72.6. The HTC U11 design is thinner and incredibly lighter than vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper screen than HTC U11, because although it has a quite lower pixel number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro has a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. HTC U11 features a much better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X80 Pro features a way better battery performance than HTC U11, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a very superior camera than HTC U11, because it has a way larger sensor, a much higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a bigger camera aperture to capture better images in low-light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.