Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 global score. The LG V35 ThinQ is an incredibly older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but LG was able to make it way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a better looking screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much longer battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 42% more battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.6 aperture, the vivo X80 Pro also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more MP back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.