Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V40 ThinQ is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, getting an 81.2 score against 72.6. Although the LG V40 ThinQ is a lot older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. These phones have Android operating system, but the LG V40 ThinQ has 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a really superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X80 Pro has a brighter screen than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little bigger display.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a better memory to store more games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Vivo X80 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
Vivo X80 Pro has a very superior camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.