Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | LG |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the vivo X80 Pro, with a global score of 87.1 against 72.6. The LG Velvet is an extremely older cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, but it's somewhat lighter and thinner anyway. LG Velvet has a way better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper screen than LG Velvet, and although they both have a display of the same size, the vivo X80 Pro also has a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. LG Velvet has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X80 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG Velvet, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro features a much better camera than LG Velvet, because it has a much bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs, a larger aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations, a better resolution back camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.