Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Microsoft |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Glacier and Obsidian |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than the vivo X80 Pro, having an 85.3 score against 72.6. Even though the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 and vivo X80 Pro were released only 8 months apart, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 construction is thinner but also way heavier than vivo X80 Pro. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The vivo X80 Pro has a sharper screen than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a little smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch in the screen and a much brighter screen. Vivo X80 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a much better performing CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a lot better camera than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X80 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.