Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a general score of 87.1, which is better than the vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra design is newer, just a little thinner and a bit lighter than the vivo X80 Pro. These phones work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version, so it offers some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has much darker screen, it also counts with a bit larger display, a greater pixel quantity in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a CPU that's just as good as vivo X80 Pro's CPU, they have 12 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has much more storage for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X80 Pro has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro captures a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, and although they both have a same size aperture, a 0.77 inches back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a 50 mega pixels, the vivo X80 Pro also has a much better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.