Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z Force is just a bit better than vivo X80 Pro, having a overall score of 75.8 against 72.6. The Motorola Moto Z Force is an incredibly older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but Motorola was able to build it way lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. These phones include Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto Z Force has a newer 7.0 Nougat version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12, giving you a couple additional features and performance enhancements.
The vivo X80 Pro features a brighter screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a quite lower quantity of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a very superior processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a greater camera than Moto Z Force, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way higher video definition and a larger diafragm aperture. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo X80 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.