Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play has a global score of 77.4, which is just a bit better than the vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Moto Z2 Play's body is lighter and a lot thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released 5 years before. The vivo X80 Pro features a lot better screen than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a larger screen, a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a better display pixels density.
The Moto Z2 Play counts with a very superior performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Moto Z2 Play has a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Vivo X80 Pro shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a bigger aperture, a way better video definition and a camera in the back with a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution. Vivo X80 Pro features a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.