Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro, having a overall score of 77.6 against 72.6. The Moto Z3 is an older device than the vivo X80 Pro, but it is notably thinner and extremely lighter anyway. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Moto Z3 has a newer 9.0 Pie version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version, giving a couple additional features.
The vivo X80 Pro has a better looking display than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has more pixels per screen inch, a quite larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Motorola Moto Z3 has a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Moto Z3 features a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The vivo X80 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low light situations and a way higher video definition.
The vivo X80 Pro features a very superior battery life than Moto Z3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.