Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper has a global score of 79.8, which is slightly better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 global score. Motorola One Hyper is an noticeably older cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but Motorola was able to make it a bit thinner and just a bit lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Motorola One Hyper has older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X80 Pro features a way better looking screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a bit bigger display and a higher pixels density. Motorola One Hyper counts with a better storage capacity for apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper has a really superior processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The vivo X80 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro has superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.