Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Motorola |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, having an 87 score against 72.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. The Motorola razr (2020) body is thinner and lighter than the vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released just 20 months before.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X80 Pro has a much sharper screen than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite larger screen, a greater screen pixel density and a lot higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
Motorola razr (2020)'s memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as vivo X80 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X80 Pro features a way better battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 68% greater battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro features a much better camera than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a lot larger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a much higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments and a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.